Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, from the date of the conclusion of the judgment, each of the defendants is against the defendants for one year from the date of the judgment.

Punishment of the crime

On September 2014, the Defendants forged the F’s resident registration certificate in the name of Defendant B by attaching Defendant B’s photograph instead of the above F photograph to the resident registration certificate in the name of Defendant B, a Chinese resident, for the employment of Defendant B, such as duty-free shops in the Republic of Korea.

Defendant B, according to the above public offering on October 2014, for the purpose of exercising in China, sent by mail the F resident registration certificate in the name of the F, which was borrowed from the above F, and the evidentiary photographs of Defendant B from the above F, and Defendant B’s name in the name column, “F,” “G” in the resident registration number column, and address column “Seoul Mapo-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City.”

H. 403, “403 May 30, 2014,” and “head of Mapo-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City,” were written in the Issuing Authorities column, and Defendant B’s photograph was attached to the photograph column.

As a result, the Defendants forged the resident registration certificate under the name of the head of Mapo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, which is an official document, for the purpose of uttering.

Summary of Evidence

1. The Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the suspect against the defendant B (including the part concerning the statement of the defendant A);

1. A protocol concerning the examination of suspect against the defendant B;

1. The A Kakao Stockholm details on the mobile phone;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs of seized articles;

1. Articles 225 and 30 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act of the Suspension of Execution (see, e.g., that there is no record of punishment for the same crime; Defendant B has no record of criminal punishment in the Republic of Korea; and that social risks are not realized as the ultimate objective of the crime has not been achieved);

1. Defendant A: Article 48 (1) 2 of the Criminal Act;