logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안산지원 2013.06.26 2013고정349
남북교류협력에관한법률위반
Text

Defendant

A A A Fine of 2,00,000 won, Defendant B of the Company A of a fine of 2,000,000 won, and Defendant C of the Company A of a fine of 500.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

around September 2009, A and F entered the GIC in order to supply food, food materials, etc. to the company located in the GIC to the Minister of Unification after reporting the cooperative project to the representative director of the corporation B. In order to carry out the project.

Defendant

A operated a business entity called G, supplied food and food materials to the above B, and acquired the above B from the F around August 6, 2010.

However, the visit to the GIC by the Korean nationals is limited to the visit for the purpose of investment inspection, it is practically operated by the group visit, and it is necessary to submit an individual business plan and to obtain such approval, and it requires complex procedures such as the demand for the invitation to North Korean counterpart.

Moreover, as a result of the Dried Incident on March 26, 2010, 524 measures such as refusing to North Korea's protection and refusing to make new investments to North Korea have been taken, human and material exchanges related to inter-Korean exchange and cooperation were temporarily suspended.

F was supplied with food, food materials, etc. from the G operated by Defendant A and supplied them to the relocated company in the GIC, and the F planned to use the said G’s employees as employees of the stock company reported as a cooperative business entity in the GIC, which would be able to obtain the approval of the North Korean Industrial Complex. In collusion with Defendant A, the F decided to implement the approval procedure for the North Korean Industrial Complex by forging the status of employees.

1. On September 16, 2009, Defendant A and F’s joint mediationF visited the Internet Inter-Korean Exchange and Cooperation System (www Long.go.km) operated by the Ministry of Unification, and the fact was stated as “B” in the name of the workplace of H despite that H is not a employee of “B,” and the Ministry of Unification, upon receipt of the application for approval of the North Korea, approved the North Korea of the above H on September 17, 2009.

In addition, F and Defendant A are above.

arrow