logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 고양지원 2016.03.23 2014고단1916
폭행등
Text

Defendant A shall be punished by a fine of one million won, and by a fine of seven hundred thousand won.

The above fine shall not be paid by the Defendants.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendants were residing in the F-Public Noticeel with the 9th floor of the Goyang-gu E Building in Gyeyang-gu, Gyeyang-gu.

1. Defendant A

A. On March 27, 2014, around 09:00, the Defendant said that, in front of the victim’s room, Defendant B (44 tax) would not smoke within the telecom of this public notice.

As the demand was made, it was assaulted, such as cutting the victim's neck by selling it.

B. The Defendant, around 12:40 on March 28, 2014, talked about the dispute that had existed before the injured party B on the rooftop of the E building, and the Defendant, “I am why we have the complete work.”

“A victim was injured by assaulting the victim, such as duplicating the victim’s fat, duplicating the fat, and duplicating the victim’s fat, and causing approximately four weeks of treatment.”

2. Defendant B

A. On March 27, 2014, around 09:00, the Defendant: (a) resisted the victim A (54 tax) with respect to smoking tobacco within the telecom of this public notice; and (b) assaulted the victim’s flaps, etc. while working in a dispute.

B. On March 28, 2014, at around 12:40, the Defendant, while talking about the dispute at the dispute that had existed before the victim A on the rooftop of the building above, was physically injured by the victim, such as assaulting the victim by cutting down the batus and fating the bats of the victim, etc., which requires approximately five weeks of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

[Judgment No. 1]

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Partial testimony of the witness B;

1. The witness G’s testimony (a consistent statement from an investigative agency that the Defendants were engaged in breathing on March 38, 2014)

1. Results of watching and listening to video recording products;

1. A written diagnosis of injury (the fact under Article 2 of the Judgment);

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Partial testimony of the witness A;

1. The witness G’s testimony (a consistent statement from the investigative agency that the Defendants were engaged in dubling each other on March 38, 2014)

1. Video recording results fall under the act of attack by mutual assault.

arrow