Defendant

A A shall be punished by a fine of KRW 80,000,000,000,000,000.

The above fines are imposed by the Defendants.

Punishment of the crime

1. On March 24, 2017, Defendant A: (a) 20:10, at the front of the bus end point of the Dong bus that was Jin-gu, Jin-gu, Seoul, the Defendant inflicted bodily injury on the victim B (64 years) and the city bus operated by the Defendant on the front of the bus end of the city bus that was Jina or the victim’s bomb; (b) tightly pushed down the breath; and (c) boomed the victim’s face by drinking, and booming the victim’s face on the floor, and boomed the victim’s face into the floor for about two weeks.

2. Defendant B, while intending to see a side on a bus parked after the bus parked at the time and place specified in the above paragraph 1, she expressed the victim A (56 years of age) as “I see this son in the process of spawn,” and spawned the victim’s spath, and carried the victim’s spawn face in drinking, and suffered injury, such as spawn’s salt, tension, etc., for about two weeks of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

[Defendant A]

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning suspect B (including a written examination of injury) of the police;

1. Results of this Court for viewing CD reproduction;

1. Photographs of CCTV screen (Defendant B);

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. A legal statement of a witness;

1. A protocol of suspect interrogation of the police officer (including a written diagnosis of injury);

1. Results of this Court for viewing CD reproduction;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs of CCTV pictures;

1. Relevant Article 257 of the Criminal Act and the Defendants’ choice of punishment for the crime: Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act

1. Defendants to be detained in a workhouse: Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act

1. Defendants of the provisional payment order: Taking into account the fact that the degree of injury of the victims on the grounds of sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act was relatively not much serious, and the Defendants appealed against each other.