logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2017.09.26 2017구합65976
교원소청심사위원회결정취소
Text

1. The instant lawsuit shall be dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. On March 1, 2004, the Plaintiff was newly appointed as a teacher of the Jeonnam Industrial High School within the jurisdiction of the Gwangju Metropolitan City Office of Education, and was on March 1, 2015 through personnel exchanges among Cities/Dos, and was on childcare leave on May 30, 2015 when working at the Ansan Industrial High School within the jurisdiction of the Gyeonggi-do Office of Education.

B. On October 2016, the Plaintiff submitted to the Defendant a letter of wishes for personnel exchange among the Cities/Dos wishing to move to Gwangju Metropolitan City.

C. On November 3, 2016, the Plaintiff filed a civil petition requesting the Defendant to review the following matters through a national newspaper (hereinafter “instant civil petition”).

Civil petition title: The Office of Education of Gyeonggi-do requires three-year teaching experience at the time of application for transfer of other City/Do as follows, and the spouse of the employee of the former public institution shall be excluded.

Article 17 (Inter-Korean Exchange of Teachers) (4) of the Enforcement Standards for Personnel Management of Public Educational Officials in Gyeonggi-do (Inter-Korean Exchange of Teachers) (4) No person who wishes to move to another City/Do shall be subject to the Regulations on Non-transfer to Other Cities/Dos for a certain period at the time of appointment

Provided, That the spouse of the former public institution staff shall be excluded.

The author has the educational career at the Gyeonggi-do Office of Education for less than three years.

However, I wish to move to Gwangju Metropolitan City as a spouse of an employee of the relocating public institution.

However, the Gyeonggi-do Office of Education is not entitled to apply for the transfer to Gwangju Metropolitan City on the ground that the location of the Gyeonggi-do Joint Innovation City is located in the case of Gwangju Metropolitan City.

I will examine whether it is reasonable to restrict Gwangju Metropolitan City and to allow Jeonnam-do to move to a public institution's spouse prior to Gwangjunam Joint Innovation City as a person with less than three years' experience in education of public schools in Gyeonggi-do. D.

2.3.

arrow