The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

Litigation costs shall be borne by the plaintiff.

1. Circumstances and details of the transfer appointment;

A. From 2013, the Plaintiff was serving as English teacher in Seoul High School (hereinafter “instant school”).

B. On September 11, 2015, the principal of the instant case rendered a caution measure (hereinafter “instant caution measure”) against the Plaintiff on the ground that “the Plaintiff caused confusion in the recommendation of the personnel advisory committee, etc. in relation to the replacement of a fence and the process of decision-making by the principal of the school to reverse the replacement of a fence.”

C. On December 23, 2015, 44 of the 46 teachers of the instant school (hereinafter “instant teachers”) signed a petition for the request for transfer to the Plaintiff (hereinafter “instant petition”) with the following contents, and thereafter, submitted the instant petition to the Defendant via “National Examination” as a civil petition.

In this atmosphere, the petition for the transfer of the plaintiff against the plaintiff (asy as) is filed with the superintendent of the Office of Education for the development and harmony of the school.

The plaintiff, at his own request, is unable to adapt to the school with the complaints about the non-influence in the innovative school, and the influence with the members is commonized.

Specifically, there are cases such as interference with the decision-making process of various committees and objection to decisions, interference with examination affairs, interference with academic events and consultations, interference with school year events, job attitude, verbal abuse, injury to school supplies, etc. to students.

For this reason, most of the students in the same academic year as well as teachers in the same curriculum and the same department have suffering, extreme pressure, and even teachers who receive hospital treatment.

Therefore, not only the harmony and development of schools, but also the development of the plaintiff's individual, it is necessary to start anew in other places.

Therefore, the superintendent of the Office of Education wishes to move all the petition teachers if the plaintiff's transfer to another school is not made strongly.

December 23, 2015

The principal of this case shall be the principal.