logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 장흥지원 2016.03.10 2016고단2
사기등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal records] On August 13, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to six months of imprisonment for fraud, etc. in the Gwangju District Court’s interest support, and completed the execution of the sentence in the Gwangju District Court on December 2, 2015.

[Criminal facts]

1. On December 18, 2015, the Defendant interfered with the business of the victim C and damaged property: (a) around December 21, 2015, at the E-cafeteria operated by the victim C in the Southern-gun, the Defendant expressed the victim at a large lusium on the ground that the victim did not drink himself/herself; (b) the Defendant released the 20 minutes of the 20 minutes of the lusium to the glass of the lusium.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the victim's restaurant business by force, and damaged the victim's market price of 130,000 won.

2. On December 21, 2015, the Defendant: (a) 22:00 on December 21, 2015, 2015, the Defendant: (b) Had the Victim F working for the Victim F in the Nam-gun G, the victim was intending to take the victim from drinking at a large interest rate on the ground that the victim did not sell his/her alcohol; (c) Had the victim was intending to take the victim from drinking at a large interest rate; and (d) the victim was able to take the victim from drinking 30 minutes of the disturbance by avoiding the disturbance between approximately 30 minutes of the disturbance and entering the said H tea.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the victim's multiple business by force.

3. On December 21, 2015, the Defendant: (a) committed an act as if the Defendant would normally pay the price to the injured party I in K, which is operated by the injured party I in the J of the Nam-gun, Nam-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun on December 21, 2015; and (b) in a can caner in the said Smarket, which was in the said Smarket cooling.

They go back.

However, the defendant did not have the intention or ability to pay the price to the victim.

As above, the defendant deceivings the victim and was delivered one can cans equivalent to the market price of 1,800 won from the victim, i.e., the victim.

4. On December 2015, the accused against the victim L by fraud.

arrow