Defendant shall be punished by a fine of five million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

1. On March 2, 2007, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (drinking driving) is a person who has received a summary order of a fine of one million won or more due to a violation of the Road Traffic Act (drinking driving) from the Daegu District Court on March 2, 2007, and on January 9, 2009, a fine of one million won or more due to a violation of the Road Traffic Act (drinking driving) in the Daegu District Court Kimcheon-cheon Branch of the Daegu District Court on January 9, 2009 and received a summary

On October 25, 2015, around 19:25, the Defendant driven a 10km XD vehicle of approximately 10km in alcohol while driving a 0.053% alcohol concentration in the blood, from around the street in front of the dat in the same military as that located in the same military.

2. The defendant who interferes with his/her duties is found in D in G in the Gyeongbuk-gun of Gyeongbuk-do operated by the Victim F, the wife of which is the one described in paragraph (1).

He requested two Lives Gap to change on credit, but he was rejected.

Accordingly, the defendant does not provide funeral services to customers in the convenience store.

At the same time, it is difficult to see the Garash and the customer does not leave as soon as possible, and it was found out of the above AXD vehicle and entered the bar, and the victim did not open the entrance.

The Defendant interfered with the victim's business by 10 minutes of the wooden machine which was in possession of the Defendant, putting the entrance door down at hand, pushing the entrance door several times, etc.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. The witness G and H’s respective legal statements, and the witness F’s some legal statements;

1. Statement made by the police with regard to F;

1. Report on the situation of a driver driving a drinking and report on the results of regulating drinking driving;

1. On-site and wooden inspectors;

1. Investigation report (verification of suspect's history of driving alcohol) and two copies of summary order (the defendant and his defense counsel have measured two cans of beer at a convenience store after drinking alcohol;

The argument is asserted.

Witness

The F stated in this law that the defendant drank one or two cans of beer at the convenience store, but submitted as evidence of impeachment.