logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 순천지원 2016.08.11 2016고단54
사기등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of eight million won.

However, if the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Dec. 23, 2015, the Defendant, at around 18:00 on December 23, 2015, acted as if he/she would pay the drinking value by ordering alcohol and alcohol from the “E” point of the “E” point of the victim D’s operation in the male and female city C.

However, there is no intention or ability to pay the price even if the order of alcoholic beverage, eye, etc. is made because there is no cash or credit card in possession.

The Defendant received from the injured party the 50,000 won total of the market value of the 50,000 won and the 5 Byung-ju and the 1st century, and acquired property profits equivalent to the same amount.

2. Business interference [2016 Height 54] The Defendant does not interfere with the F on the ground that from around 18:00 on December 23, 2015 to around 19:23 on the same day, an employee F would demand the F to pay an amount of KRW 50,000 with the drinking value of KRW 50,000 on the said place.

“The victim D’s main business affairs were obstructed by force by having the customers leave the disturbance at the main place, such as having the customer dance, etc., in a large manner, and having the customer leave the disturbance.

3. Property damage [2016 Height 187] Around December 30, 2015, the Defendant rejected a request for drinking from the injured party of the Victim G G management of the victim G Ha on a leisure time at around 20:30 on December 30, 2015, and the Defendant broken off by walking with the entrance door and glass door of the above 2.50,00 won at the market price of the victim’s ownership.

Accordingly, the defendant damaged the victim's property.

4. Obstruction of business affairs (2016 order 187).

A. On December 30, 2015, the Defendant committed the crime at the time and place specified in paragraph (3) for the foregoing reasons, and, as seen earlier, committed a disturbance between 30 minutes of the entrance and the glass window, and led customers who had drinking alcohol in the said danran bar to take out of the danran bar.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the victim's main business by force.

B. On January 25, 2016, the Defendant committed a crime on January 25, 2016 is the victim I at the time of leisure around 18:00 on January 25, 2016.

arrow