logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2014.07.23 2013고단7535
폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(집단ㆍ흉기등상해)등
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor of one year and fine of 300,000 won, and Defendant B shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor of one year.

Defendant

A above.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[2013 Highest 7535]

1. The Defendants violated the Punishment of Violence, etc. Act (joint injury) around 05:45 on April 6, 2013, on the street, the main point of “E” located on the first floor of Seocho-gu Seoul Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government D D underground, and on the ground that the victim F (the age of 21) accessed the Defendant’s her mother children living together with the Defendant, Defendant B was tightly faced with the victim, and the victim was tightly pushed back and drinking. The Defendant A was able to have the victim’s face by drinking and drinking so that the victim’s face can be taken several times, and the Defendant B was able to find the victim’s head so that the victim’s head cannot identify the number of days of treatment.

Accordingly, the Defendants jointly inflicted an injury on the victim.

[2014 Highest 345]

2. Defendant A

(a) No person shall drive a motorcycle without obtaining a driver's license for a larceny or for a violation of the Road Traffic Act;

Nevertheless, at around 05:52 on June 29, 2013, the Defendant found the “I” CT100 Orala, which temporarily stops on the front of the Gangnam-gu Seoul Building with the victim H turning on the starting road, without obtaining a driver’s license, and driven approximately 2-3 meters after driving on the above Orala, while driving on the above Orala.

Accordingly, the defendant stolen the victim's property and driving a motorcycle without receiving a motorcycle driver's license.

B. Violation of the Road Traffic Act and the violation of the Road Traffic Act (Non-accident after Accidents) the Defendant driven “I” CT100 Oral Seas as stated in the above paragraph at the time and place mentioned in the above paragraph (a).

In such cases, there was a duty of care to prevent accidents in advance by safely driving a motor vehicle, such as taking the front, rear, and left and right of the motor vehicle, and accurately operating the steering gear.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so.

arrow