logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2017.06.13 2017고단944
도로교통법위반(음주운전)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

Reasons

Criminal facts

1. The Defendant was sentenced to a summary order of KRW 5 million on March 21, 2012 to a fine of KRW 1,00,000 for a violation of road traffic law at the Suwon Friwon on March 21, 2012, and the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two years for a period of four months due to a violation of road traffic law on November 29 of the same year.

[2] On January 14, 2017, the Defendant driven a B SP car under the influence of alcohol concentration of approximately 0.260% from the 200m section of the apartment to the front road of approximately 105 apartment buildings from the 200m section of the same apartment complex from the 200m section to the 105 upper road.

2. On November 22, 2016, the Defendant driven a motor vehicle in the influence of alcohol by a police officer E who belongs to a police station D police station in the Gyeonggi-Seng-dong East Police Station, while driving a motor vehicle in the vicinity of the building C at Osan-si on November 22, 2016, under the influence of alcohol, while he/she driven a motor vehicle in the direction of the building B in the direction of drinking, and the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol, such as heavy snow, rain, and snow shock.

Due to reasonable grounds, there was a demand to respond to a drinking measuring instrument by inserting approximately 30 minutes into a drinking measuring instrument.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, along with the bath theory, is unable to do so, and the Defendant is required to have a wide drinking experience in the flaz.

However, I would like to measure me:

B. We can see the measurement of drinking, and the police station's Gaz Dozk kb

B. Ling-to-kick kackers

The term "does not measure drinking," and thus, the police officer did not comply with a request for a measurement of drinking without justifiable grounds.

Summary of Evidence

[Judgment 1] Facts 1, 2017 order 944]

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Notice of the situation and result of controlling the driving driver;

1. Previous conviction: A copy of a written reply to inquiry, such as criminal history, text of the judgment, and summary order [the facts of subparagraph 2 of the judgment, the second sentence 1944 of the judgment];

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A written statement;

1. Notification 1. Report on the circumstances of a driver in charge of driving and the results of the crackdown on drinking;

arrow