Main Issues
(a) Trial failure to disclose a reversion relationship with the right to reclaim public waters;
(b) Effects of the resolution on the change of the association members without the authorization of the licensing authority on the collective ownership of public waters; and
Summary of Judgment
Where the reclamation right is jointly owned by a member of the fraternity, the withdrawal or new entry under the rules of the fraternity shall not be effective to change the reclamation right holder unless the license authority obtains the approval of the reclamation.
[Reference Provisions]
Article 20 of the Public Waters Reclamation Act, Article 28 of the Enforcement Decree of the Public Waters Reclamation Act
Plaintiff, Appellant
Plaintiff 1 and one other
Defendant-Appellee
Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry and one other
The court below
Seoul High Court Decision 65Gu239 delivered on February 16, 1967
Text
The original judgment is reversed, and the case is remanded to the Seoul High Court.
Reasons
According to the court below's decision that the plaintiff's original judgment was based on the former part of the plaintiff's ground of appeal. The court below's decision that the plaintiff's original judgment was based on the former part of the plaintiff's 1's original judgment that was based on the above 4th court's original judgment was based on the above 6th court's reasoning that the plaintiff's original decision was not based on the above 10th court's original decision that it was based on the above 4th court's original decision that the plaintiff's original decision was based on the above 6th court's original decision that it was based on the above 4th court's original decision that the plaintiff's original decision was based on the above 6th court's original decision that it was based on the above 4th court's original decision that the plaintiff's original decision was based on the above 10th court's original decision that the plaintiff's original decision was not based on the above 6th court's original decision that the above 6th court's original decision did not belong to the above 8th court's original decision.
Justices of the Supreme Court (Presiding Judge) Ma-dong and Kimchi-galle