The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The gist of the grounds for appeal is that the Defendant did not board a private taxi operated by the victim C, as stated in the instant facts charged, nor did he/she take a bath against the victimized police officer (the violation of the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act).

2. Determination

A. Determination 1 on the violation of the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act 1) On July 19, 2017, the Defendant stated that: (a) around 01:50 on July 19, 2017, the Defendant: (b) on the part of the facts charged, (c) on the part of the Defendant: (a) on the part of the Defendant, on the part of the company established by the victim C (Nam, South and 58 years old); (d) on the part of the company established in Guro-gu, Seoul; and (b) on the part of the court below, on the part of the Defendant, on the arrival of the Defendant at the destination, the Defendant was free from office without paying KRW 51,320; (b) on the basis of the evidence duly adopted and examined by the lower court; (d) on the part of the facts charged, the Defendant stated to the effect that the proxy witness who observed the on-site situation at the investigative agency to the effect that he did not pay charges to the victim C; and (e) on the part of the facts charged acknowledged.

나. 모욕의 점에 관한 판단 1) 이 부분 공소사실 피고인은 위와 같은 일시 및 장소에서 112신고를 받고 현장에 출동한 서울구로경찰서 F지구대 근무 경찰관인 피해자 G(남, 56세)와 같은 H(남, 36세)이 택시 요금을 지불하라고 하였다는 이유로 택시기사 및 대리기사 등이 보는 앞에서 피해자들에게 “니들이 경찰관이냐. 개같은 놈들. 느그들이 나가 도망가는 걸 봤냐 좆같은 놈들아!!” 라고 큰소리로 욕설을 하여 공연히 피해자들을 모욕하였다. 2) 판단 원심이 적법하게 채택하여 조사한 증거들에 의하여 인정되는 다음과 같은...