1. The Defendants fall within the scope of the property inherited from each network D, and fall within each category of the attached list to the Plaintiff.

Attached Form

However, there is no dispute between the parties regarding each of the facts described in the cause of the claim(s) and the facts that D died after having left Defendant A, Defendant B, and Defendant C on June 2, 2011.

Therefore, the Defendants, as the inheritors of the network D, are obligated to pay to the Plaintiff each corresponding amount (which is the amount corresponding to the Defendant’s share in the shares) indicated in the separate sheet within the scope of the property inherited from each network D as requested by the Plaintiff, as the heir of the network D, and therefore the Plaintiff’s claim against the Defendants is with merit.

(1) The Defendants pointed out that their inheritance from the network D was qualified by the Plaintiff’s division branch court of Incheon District Court Decision 2011 Madan499, and they are responsible for the repayment of the above obligation only within the scope of the inherited property from the network D. However, the Plaintiff is seeking the performance of the above obligation against the Defendants within the scope of the inherited property from the network D. Thus, the above circumstances pointed out by the Defendants do not interfere with the Plaintiff’s claim).