1. The Defendants fall within the scope of the property inherited from each network D, and fall within each category of the attached list to the Plaintiff.

Attached Form

Each fact in the cause of the claim and each fact that D was deceased on April 30, 2015 after Defendant A, Defendant B, and Defendant C, the wife, do not have any dispute between the parties.

Therefore, the Defendants, as the inheritors of the network D, are obligated to pay to the Plaintiff each corresponding amount (which is the amount corresponding to the Defendant’s share of inheritance) indicated in the separate sheet within the scope of the property inherited from each network D, as sought by the Plaintiff, as the heir of the network D, so the Plaintiff’s claim against the Defendants is with merit.

As to this, the Defendants asserted to the effect that they cannot respond to the Plaintiff’s claim on the grounds that they limited the inheritance from the above network D as Seoul Family Court Decision 2015Ra6810, but the inheritor who limited approval was succeeded to the entire inheritance obligation, but is liable to repay the inheritance obligation only within the scope of the inherited property, not its own property. As such, the Defendants are liable to perform their inheritance obligation to the Plaintiff within the scope of the inherited property from each network D. Thus, as seen above, in this case where the Plaintiff sought performance of the above obligation against the Defendants within the scope of the inherited property from each network D, the above circumstances pointed out by the Defendants do not interfere with the Plaintiff’s claim.

Therefore, all of the plaintiff's claims against the defendants are accepted, and it is so decided as per Disposition.