to the extent of the property inherited from the deceased G:

A. Defendant B is KRW 13,714,285 and among them 3,428.

1. Comprehensively taking account of the overall purport of the arguments in the evidence evidence Nos. 1 through 10, the facts in the separate sheet as to the grounds for the claim (Provided, That among the grounds for the claim before and after the change, “the Defendant” is placed in “the network G,” and “ October 16, 2004,” which are indicated in the grounds for the claim before and after the change, are collectively deemed to be “ October 26, 2004.” Thus, the Defendants are obligated to pay the Plaintiff each money as stated in the purport of the claim.

2. As to this, the Defendants asserted that the responsibility should be limited within the scope of the inherited property from the network G because they limited approval on the inheritance of the network G’s property, and therefore, according to the evidence No. B No. 1, the Defendants filed a report on limited approval concerning the inheritance of the network G’s property on November 23, 2020, as the Daegu Family Court 2020 Gadan 2215 on December 21, 2020, and it was recognized that there was a judgment to accept it from the above court assistant on December 21, 2020. Therefore, the Defendants’ above assertion is with merit.

3. Ultimately, the Defendants are obligated to pay to the Plaintiff each money as stated in the purport of the claim within the scope of the property inherited from the deceased G. Thus, the Plaintiff’s claim against the Defendants is justified within the scope of the above recognition, and the remainder is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.