The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

Litigation costs shall be borne by the plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

A. On November 30, 2017, the Plaintiff: (a) obtained a diagnosis of mination of mination of the left part of the 5th left part of the water table due to an accident beyond the road on November 30, 2017; (b) obtained a diagnosis of mination of mination of the 5th left part of the 5th part of the water table, which is a medical specialist belonging to the Defendant’s hospital, into the hospital located in Gwangjin-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City (hereinafter “Defendant hospital”); and (c) discharged from the hospital on December 4, 2017.

B. After undergoing the instant surgery, the Plaintiff continued to perform pains on the 5th left-hand balance, and on December 21, 2017, the steel line was feld along with the steel table of the pelle, along with the steel table of the pelle.

Accordingly, on January 5, 2018, the medical personnel of the Defendant Hospital performed the dynasty removal surgery against the Plaintiff, but the dynasium was disconformityd with the dynasty dynasty.

C. The Plaintiff created a pipe sports ground on the left-hand balance of 5 resin, which is based on the non-displacement of the table table, and the scope of the pipe franchising of the table table of 5 resin is about 60 degrees of soft, 40 degrees of franchising, and the scope of the pipe franchising of the table table of 5 resin is about 40 degrees of franchising, and

(hereinafter referred to as “instant disability”). 【No dispute exists, entry of Gap’s Evidence Nos. 1 through 6 (including each number), Eul’s Evidence Nos. 3 and 4 (including the serial number), the result of the request for appraisal of medical records to the Director of the F Hospital and the result of the request for physical appraisal, the purport of the entire pleadings as a whole.

2. The assertion and judgment

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion medical personnel of the Defendant Hospital violated the duty of explanation as follows, and as a result, the Plaintiff suffered interference with the public-private partnership movement at present, the Defendant, as an employer, is liable to compensate the Plaintiff for the damages incurred by the Plaintiff due to the above negligence.

1. The medical personnel of the Defendant Hospital is towing the Defendant Hospital without first considering the use of K-GGG lines, metal plates, or bridges at the time of the instant operation.