logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2020.06.11 2019가단131825
손해배상(의)
Text

1. The Defendant’s KRW 10,000,000 as well as the annual rate of KRW 5% from September 6, 2016 to June 11, 2020 to the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. From around April 2013, the Plaintiff had undergone a comprehensive health examination at the hospital operated by the Defendant (hereinafter “Defendant hospital”). On April 22, 2016, the Plaintiff was recommended to undergo a re-examination after one year from the medical staff of the Defendant hospital according to the results of the examination in 2015, compared with the results of the examination in 2015, there was no change in the left-hand re-examination, but a small amount of back-to-hand wings newly occurred, and then, according to the BDRADS 2(C2), BDR 1(C1).

B. On September 6, 2016, the Plaintiff entered the Defendant hospital as the main lake and marsh with the left-hand water flow certificate, received the examination result, and returned to the Plaintiff by wire after receiving the examination result.

The medical personnel of the Defendant Hospital confirmed on September 13, 2016 that the Plaintiff aggravated to BIDS C3 as a result of the above examination that the Plaintiff was in need of tracking inspection at intervals of six months, and that the Plaintiff was attempted to notify the Plaintiff of the above result by wire on September 27, 2016, but did not contact with the Plaintiff.

C. On October 18, 2016, the Plaintiff: (a) maintained the left-hand pain pain; (b) laid a solid hole; and (c) applied to the Defendant hospital; and (d) the medical personnel of the Defendant hospital planned to re-examine the re-undertake of the re-explosion in the 12-clock direction as a result of physical examination through promotion; and (b) to conduct an organizational inspection in the event that there is not good opinion on the re-explosion.

Accordingly, on October 24, 2016, the medical personnel of the Defendant Hospital conducted a UADS C4a tissue inspection against the Plaintiff on the following: (a) was observed at the level of BIDS C4a; (b) was to notify the Plaintiff of the result and to conduct an additional inspection on October 28, 2016; (c) as a result of the organizational inspection conducted on November 1, 2016, BIDS C6 (c) was confirmed, and (d) was conducted on November 11, 2016.

E. After the surgery, the Plaintiff is at the end of the exchange arms (on the part of the fore part of the fore part of the city) or the part of the fore part of the day.

arrow