1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

A. On October 1, 2014, the Plaintiff d Hospital located in Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Nowon-gu (hereinafter “Defendant Hospital”), which was operated by the Defendant, brought an appeal for the pass of the left-hand hand on October 2, 2014 through the C rehabilitation medical staff.

B. The Plaintiff was diagnosed by the medical personnel of the Defendant Hospital at the second half of the closed balone and the second half of the upper left-hand body. At the time, there was pulverization of the Plaintiff’s upper left-hand body, which invadeds the middle balone, and the balone of the original abandonment was formed with a little number of books, and there was a subordinate installment payments organization.

C. On October 7, 2014, the Plaintiff: (a) hospitalized in the Defendant Hospital; (b) under the supervision of the medical personnel of the Defendant Hospital, the Plaintiff was discharged from Non-cerebral and internal surgery using the KGG line with respect to Non-cerebral and internal surgery (hereinafter “instant surgery”); (c) discharged on October 8, 2014; and (d) five KG lines were used in order to maintain the climaticone at the time of the said surgery.

At present, while the plaintiff's extraction of the aggregate of the aggregate of the aggregates of the double-water duness of the second upper-water dunes of the left side and the treatment of the body is completed after removal of the body, the scope of the passive dunes of the second double-water dunes of the plaintiff's secondary dunes is about 50 degrees of dunes, the restriction of the new dunes, and the need

[Ground of recognition] The facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1, 2, Eul evidence 1-1 to 14, the result of the physical appraisal commission to the F Hospital Head of this Court, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The plaintiff's assertion

A. Due to the negligence of the instant surgery by the medical personnel of the Defendant Hospital, the sum of misappropriations occurred in the second half of the Plaintiff’s left-hand body, and the loss of the Plaintiff’s ability to work was lost by 4%.

B. The medical personnel of the Defendant Hospital did not explain about the general anesthesia before the instant surgery, and performed a general anesthesia for the Plaintiff, without doing so.