logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 1995. 7. 3.자 94스30 결정
[재산분할][공1995.9.1.(999),2987]
Main Issues

In the case of resolving a de facto marital relationship, whether division of property is permitted

Summary of Decision

A person who is a legal spouse is not allowed to file a claim for division of property with the other party in a de facto marital relationship, except in extenuating circumstances such as de facto divorce.

[Reference Provisions]

Article 839-2 of the Civil Act

Re-Appellant, Claimant

Claimant

upper protection room:

Other Party

Judgment of the lower court

Seoul High Court Order 94Bu9 Dated July 22, 1994

Text

The reappeal by an appellant is dismissed.

Expenses for reappeals shall be borne by the petitioner.

Reasons

The grounds of reappeal are examined.

The court below rejected the claim in this case by the claimant's holding that the claimant who is a legally spouse is not allowed to claim the division of property on the ground of resolution of de facto marriage with the other party, unless there are special circumstances such as the legal divorce relationship between the claimant and the non-party, and there is no error of law by misunderstanding the facts against the rules of evidence or misunderstanding the legal principles on the division of property due to violation of the rules of evidence such as the theory of lawsuit.

There is no reason to discuss this issue.

Therefore, without further proceeding to decide on the remaining grounds of reappeal, the reappeal is dismissed, and the costs of reappeal are assessed against the appellant. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices.

Justices Cho Chang-tae (Presiding Justice)

arrow
심급 사건
-서울고등법원 1994.7.22.자 94브9