logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2015.12.18 2015나16896
손해배상(자)
Text

1.The judgment of the first instance shall be modified as follows:

The Defendants jointly do so with each of the Plaintiffs KRW 19,959,531, respectively.

Reasons

1. The reasons why the court should explain this part of the liability for damages are as stated in the corresponding part of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the addition of the following parts, and thus, it is acceptable in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil

(1) The following shall be added at the end of the third 13 line of the judgment of the first instance:

[Defendant Han-man asserts to the effect that there is no causal relationship between the shock of Defendant 2’s vehicle and the death of the deceased, merely because Defendant 2’s vehicle was her part of the body of the deceased, and that there was no causal relationship between the shock of the vehicle and the deceased’s body. However, in the death diagnosis report (No. 2) on the deceased, the death diagnosis report on the deceased, the cause of the death of the deceased’s direct death is multi-life, multi-life, and the cause of the salutic salutic salutic salutism is stated in multi-life, and the cause of the salutic salutic salutic salutism is entered into the death after the death by the multi-salutic salutic salute caused by the instant accident, and the shock by Defendant 2’s vehicle driver is found to have caused the death of the deceased. In light of the above Defendant’s assertion is without merit.

The Defendants asserted to the effect that the deceased’s negligence of crossing without permission is larger than the negligence of the drivers of the Defendant 1 and 2. However, although the deceased’s pedestrian signal starts with the crosswalk and changed to the red signal on the road when it is green signal, they were crossing the rest of the crosswalk as it was and faced with the instant accident. Since such pedestrian is often common sense, the driver of a motor vehicle passing along the crosswalk before and after the time when the pedestrian signal changed to the stop signal on the green signal is changed to the stop signal, not driving a motor vehicle, but on the left and right side by the trust that pedestrians should comply thoroughly with the traffic signal.

arrow