logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2015.02.10 2014가단5202076
손해배상(자)
Text

1. The Defendants each of the Plaintiffs’ KRW 26,50,000 and each of them shall be annually from December 28, 2013 to February 10, 2015.

Reasons

1. Occurrence of liability for damages;

A. Facts of recognition 1) C is a D vehicle at around 23:20 on December 28, 2013 (hereinafter “Defendant 1”)

) By negligence, while driving a vehicle and driving a road of 171-1, Dong-dong 171-1, Nam-gu, Incheon Metropolitan City, along one lane, from the 3-lane west-do road to the west-do west-do west-do west-do west-do west-do west-do west-do, it violates the pedestrian signal from the left side of the proceeding direction to the right side of the crosswalk and the pedestrian crossing

) Defendant 1 was shocked in front of the right side of the vehicle. The latter is the G vehicle (hereinafter referred to as “Defendant 2 vehicle”).

(2) On January 1, 2014, the Deceased died before multiple growth contribution around 07:21, 2014. (2) The Plaintiffs are the children of the Deceased, and the Defendant Eastern Fire Marine Insurance Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant East Fire”) are the insurers that concluded each comprehensive automobile insurance contract with respect to Defendant 2, as to Defendant 2, by negligence of neglecting the duty of Jeonju City Mayor’s duty while changing the fleet from the first lane to the second lane.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1 through 5, 10 evidence, Eul evidence 3, 4, Eul evidence 2 (including provisional number), the purport of the whole pleadings

B. According to the facts of recognition of liability, the Defendants are each insurers of Defendant 1 and 2 vehicles, and are liable for damages suffered by the Plaintiffs, who are the deceased and their bereaved families.

C. Limit of liability, however, it is deemed that the Deceased was negligent in governance by violating the signal at night, and that such negligence contributed to the occurrence of the instant accident and the expansion of damage, and thus, the Defendants’ responsibility is limited to 60%.

(40%) 2.2.

arrow