1. All appeals filed by the plaintiffs are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiffs.

The purport of the claim and the appeal.

1. Under the underlying facts, the following facts do not conflict between the parties, or can be acknowledged by comprehensively taking account of the overall purport of the arguments as to the entries in Gap evidence 1-3, the first instance court, and the arbitral tribunal of the Korea Medical Dispute Mediation and Arbitration Division of this Court.

A. 1) The F (hereinafter “the Deceased”) is a person who suffers from urology, etc. due to L’s birth, and was directly dead of her dysium at I Hospital as a private person on July 28, 2015.

Plaintiff

A The deceased's spouse, the plaintiff B, and C are children of the deceased.

2) Defendant D is an intention to operate a DNA member located in Seongdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government (hereinafter “Defendant 1 member”), and Defendant E is an employer of the medical staff of the operator of the HI hospital located in Gwangjin-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government (hereinafter “Defendant 2 hospital”).

B. (1) During the period of treatment of the Deceased, Defendant 1 member and the Deceased met with the left knee on May 14, 2015, and a pain occurred, and he/she took care of Defendant 1 member on three occasions on May 19, 2015, and he/she took care of the knee in three times on June 12, 2015, and was given a prescription. From June 17, 2015 to July 8, 2015, he/she took care of the knee in one member and took care of the knee in one member of Defendant 1 member again from July 16, 2015.

On July 22, 2015, the Deceased moved back to the left kneeee in Tri-si, Tri-si, an Switzerland, with Defendant 1’s members, after several hours of time, there was a flag and red reflect on the telegraph, along with the flag and the flag on the left side.

Accordingly, on July 23, 2015, the deceased visited Defendant 1 member again on July 23, 2015, and the defendant D administered the amount of the deceased and the s the s the s the s the 15mmmpex loss to the deceased, but the symptoms of the deceased continued.

Defendant D recommended Defendant D to receive medical treatment at Defendant 2 hospital in the event that his condition does not change.

2) The Deceased’s treatment progress at Defendant 2 Hospital (A) on July 23, 2015, Defendant 2 hospital around 16:46.