A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

Seized evidence 1 to 4 shall be confiscated from the accused.

Punishment of the crime

[Criminal history] The Defendant was sentenced to six months of imprisonment with prison labor and two years of suspended execution on November 29, 2016 at the Cheongju District Court’s Cheongju District Court’s Cheongju District Court’s Cheongju Branch for larceny of intrusion on night buildings, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on December 7, 2016 and is currently under suspended execution

[Criminal facts]

1. Larceny of intrusion on night buildings;

A. On January 28, 2017, the Defendant: (a) up to 01:00, at the “E” operated by the victim D, who was in public interest area C; (b) opened an entrance in advance by placing the opening door in the key hole of the entrance, and intrudes into the restaurant; and (c) cut off the cash owned by the victim, which is kept in the bank of public interest in public interest, by taking the victim’s cash.

B. On January 28, 2017, at around 02:00, the Defendant intruded into the restaurant by the victim G in the public interest area F, Young-gu, Cheongju-si, and then stolen the cash amounting to KRW 4,000 in possession of the victim, which is kept in the public interest center in the public interest center, by means of the foregoing method.

(c)

On February 1, 2017, at around 08:20, the Defendant: (a) opened an entrance by means of opening the entrance door door door locked through the said date locked; (b) intruded into a restaurant; and (c) stolen the cash owned by the victim, which is kept in the Kabter’s depository, with the victim’s cash 40,000 won kept in the Kabter’s depository.

2. On January 28, 2017, the Defendant attempted to larceny at night buildings by: (a) around 01:00, the Defendant opened a entrance and entered a restaurant in the manner as referred to in the foregoing paragraph 1(a) and attempted to steal the property into the restaurant, but the Defendant did not commit an attempted crime because the entrance was not opened because the said date drone did not enter the key hole.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each written statement of D, G, J, and M;

1. On-site photographs and investigation reports (net 17);

1. A report on internal investigation (net 4);

1. Records of police seizure, lists of seizure, and photographs of seized articles;

1. A previous conviction in judgment: