A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

[Criminal record] On September 7, 2016, the Defendant was sentenced to six months of imprisonment with prison labor and two years of suspended execution due to fraud, etc. at the Incheon District Court, and the judgment became final and conclusive on September 20, 2016.

[Criminal facts] From August 23, 2015, the Defendant is a person who works as a mobile phone sales employee at a company E with the second floor of the Bupyeong-gu Incheon Metropolitan City D Underground Commercial Building operated by the victim C from August 23, 2015.

1. On August 24, 2015, the Defendant committed the crime of forging private documents and exercising the aforesaid investigation document (1) on August 24, 2015, the Defendant: (a) on August 24, 2015, entered the application form for the purchase of a mobile phone from E Co., Ltd., a private village partner, “F”, “G” in the customer address column; (b) entered the customer address column as “F”, “H apartment 206 Dong 101”, and “F” in the applicant column; and (c) sent the forged application form for the purchase of a mobile phone under the name of F, one copy of the mobile phone; and (d) sent the forged application form to an employee under the name of LG Poper’s head office without knowledge of the forgery.

Accordingly, for the purpose of uttering, the Defendant forged a copy of a mobile phone application in F, a private document related to rights and obligations, and exercised it.

(2) On August 29, 2015, the Defendant, on August 29, 2015, entered “I”, “J”, “I”, and “I” in the column for joining the application site for subscription to the LG Plus cell phone, although there was no fact that he/she was delegated the establishment of a mobile phone from “I” to “I”, “J”, and “I” in the applicant column, and then sent one copy of the application form for subscription to the forged I’s mobile phone and then sent it to an employee under the name of the headquarters of LG Plus to whom he/she may know of the forgery.

Accordingly, the defendant, for the purpose of uttering, forged a copy of a mobile phone application in the name of I which is a private document related to rights and obligations, and exercised it.

(3) On September 2, 2015, the Defendant (titled) delegated K with the new mobile phone entry from K on September 2, 2015.