logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 2015. 12. 24. 선고 2015두52104 판결
(심리불속행)소득세법상 주택에 해당하는지 여부 및 비교과세 처분의 적법여부.[국승]
Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit

Busan High Court 2015Nu20213

Case Number of the previous trial

Madern 2014 Schedule 1372

Title

Whether it falls under a house under the Income Tax Act and the disposition of comparative taxation is legitimate.

Summary

(1) Where the exterior of a residential building, such as a main wall or pole, is a house, and the comparative taxation disposition is legitimate even if the global income amount is a deficit.

Related statutes

Article 64 of the former Income Tax Act, and Article 168-6 of the Enforcement Decree of the same Act

Cases

Supreme Court Decision 2015Du52104 Decided global income and revocation of disposition

Plaintiff-Appellee

PunishmentAA

Defendant-Appellant

BB Director of the Tax Office

Judgment of the lower court

Busan High Court 2015Nu20213

Imposition of Judgment

December 24, 2015

Text

The appeal is dismissed.

The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiff.

Reasons

All of the judgment below and the appellate brief examined the records of this case, but the appellant's grounds of appeal are not included in the grounds provided by each subparagraph of Article 4 (1) of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Procedure of Appeal, or are recognized to be groundless. Thus, the appeal is dismissed pursuant to Article 5 of the same Act. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of

arrow