logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 2016. 12. 29. 선고 2016두52170 판결
(심리불속행)명의신탁계약을 해지하고 반환하는 경우에도 증여세 신고기한 이후나 결정이후에 해지된 것이라면 명의신탁 증여의제 과세대상이 된다[국승]
Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit

Busan High Court-2015-Nu21841 (2016.02)

Title

(In the event that a trust contract is terminated and returned, if the termination or decision is terminated after the deadline for reporting gift tax, it is subject to taxation on deemed donation of title trust.

Summary

(2) Article 31(1) of the former Inheritance Tax and Gift Tax Act (amended by the Presidential Decree No. 2010, Dec. 1, 2011) provides that “In cases where a person returns the donated property (excluding money) within the time limit for report under Article 68 (3) pursuant to an agreement between the parties concerned, the donation shall be deemed not to have existed from the beginning.”

Related statutes

Article 60 of the Inheritance Tax and Gift Tax Act

Cases

Supreme Court Decision 2016Du52170 Decided revocation of Disposition imposing gift tax

Plaintiff-Appellant

x00 Foreign Affairs

Defendant-Appellee

BB Director of the Tax Office

Judgment of the lower court

Busan High Court Decision 2015Nu21841 Decided September 2, 2016

Imposition of Judgment

December 29, 2016

Text

The appeal is dismissed.

The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiff.

Reasons

All of the judgment of the court below and the records of this case were examined, but the appellant's grounds of appeal are not included in the grounds provided by each subparagraph of Article 4 (1) of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Procedure of Appeal, or are not justified. Thus, all of the appeals are dismissed under Article 5 of the same Act. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating

arrow