logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 2015. 06. 11. 선고 2015다209309 판결
(심리불속행)[국승]
Title

(Resceptic Conduct)

Summary

Whether a fraudulent act is applicable

Cases

2015Da209309 Revocation of Fraudulent Act

Plaintiff-Appellee

Korea

Defendant-Appellant

Fixed00

Judgment of the lower court

Seoul High Court Decision 2014Na2018337 Decided February 12, 2015

Text

The appeal is dismissed.

The costs of appeal are assessed against the defendant.

Reasons

All of the records of this case and the judgment of the court below and the grounds of appeal were examined, but the grounds of appeal on the grounds of appeal are not included in the grounds provided by each subparagraph of Article 4(1) of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Procedure for Appeal, and the appeal is dismissed pursuant to Article 5 of the same Act. It is so decided as per

arrow