logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 2016. 02. 18. 선고 2015두55790 판결
(심리불속행) 검찰수사결과 증거불충분의 이유로 불기소처분했다고 해서 실거래가 입증되는 것은 아님[국승]
Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit

Seoul High Court-2015-Nu-33495

Title

(D) The actual transaction is not proven solely on the ground that the prosecutor's investigation result was not a disposition of non-prosecution due to the lack of evidence.

Summary

(Summary of the Supreme Court) Even if the prosecutor's office was indicted on the grounds of the lack of evidence as a result of the prosecutor's investigation, it is difficult to deem that the actual transaction is proven.

Related statutes

Article 17 (2) 1 of the Value-Added Tax Act

All of the records of this case and the judgment of the court below and the grounds of appeal were examined, but the grounds of appeal are examined.

subsection (1) of Article 4 of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Procedure for Appeal does not include the reasons

Since it is deemed that there is no reason, the appeal is dismissed pursuant to Article 5 of the above Act, and the relevant law is dismissed.

It is decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices.

arrow