Defendant

A A shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5 million and by a fine of KRW 2.5 million, respectively.

The above fine is imposed against the Defendants.

Punishment of the crime

A. Defendant A is a person who drives a freezing truck of one ton of the Friro.

On June 11, 2014, the Defendant, while under the influence of alcohol concentration (refluence) on blood alcohol concentration (refluence) around 22:59, driven approximately 100 meters of the company-owned vehicle from the Hanwon-si river in Suwon-si, Gyeonggi-do to the Dolsan-dong 2nd apartment in the Dolsung-si, Songsan-dong, Songwon-dong, the second apartment, the post-building of the company.

On the same day, there are reasonable grounds to recognize that a person was driven under the influence of alcohol, such as taking a large amount of smells in a police box office, taking a breath of a breath, taking a breath on the face, etc., and taking a breath of a breath of a breath police box to comply with the breath test by inserting the breath of a police box belonging to the police box who intends to measure the state of

The same

F. Around 12. 00:02 the first refusal of measurement, the second refusal of measurement at around 00:14 on the same day, the third refusal of measurement at around 00:26 on the same day, and the third refusal of measurement at around 30:30 minutes on the same day, without good cause, to take a measurement of a police officer’s demand for the measurement of alcohol.

B. Defendant B is a person who is a company of I.S.

On June 22, 2014, around 11:23, 2014, the Defendant: (a) driven a vehicle at the transportation investigation department office of the Sungdong Police Station, 596; (b) while being aware of the fact that Defendant A driven the vehicle at the above port “A” and is investigating due to a refusal to take a drinking test, the Defendant prepared a written statement to the JJ of the traffic accident investigation team investigating the traffic accident and made a false statement to allow Defendant A escape.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Defendant B’s written statement

1. A report on the actual state of the driver;

1. A written report from an employee of an employer;

1. Making a report on the control of drinking driving;

1. Application of statutes on site photographs;

1. Defendant A of pertinent legal provisions concerning criminal facts: Articles 148-2 (1) 2 and 44 (2) of the Road Traffic Act (a point of refusal of measurement), and Defendant A of choice of fine: Criminal Act;