Defendant

A shall be punished by a fine of one million won and by imprisonment of six months for Defendant B.

Defendant

A does not pay the above fine.

Punishment of the crime

1. On July 15, 2018, from around 00:40 to around 00:49 of the same day, Defendant A asserted that the fare of a taxi operated by the victim E was unfairly incurred in front of the funeral hall of a hospital located in Jeju, and obstructed the victim’s taxi business by force by force, such as blocking the above taxi from body, and allowing the said taxi to get out of the floor so that it does not go.

2. 피고인 B 피고인은 2018. 7. 15. 01:04경 제주시 F에 있는 제주동부경찰서 G파출소 내에서, 위 G파출소 소속 경찰관인 경위 H이 제1항과 같은 이유로 직장동료인 A를 현행범인 체포한 것에 대해 불만을 가지고 욕을 하는 피고인에게 귀가를 요청하자 위 경위 H에게 “뭐, 이 개새꺄, 그래 한번 해보자.”, “이 새끼 너 얼굴 똑바로 기억했다”, “너 밖에 나오면 확 죽여버린다, 씨발놈아”, “한번 엮어볼까”, “밤길 눈 똑바로 뜨고 다녀라”라고 큰 소리로 말해 협박하고 피고인의 어깨와 팔 부위로 위 경위 H을 수 회 밀쳐 경찰관의 범죄의 예방ㆍ진압 및 수사에 관한 정당한 직무집행을 방해하였다.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Statement of the police statement related H;

1. E statements;

1. Application of related Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article relevant to the facts constituting an offense and the selection of punishment;

A. Defendant A: Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act; Selection of fines

B. Defendant B: Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act; the choice of imprisonment

1. Defendant A to be detained in a workhouse: Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendant B of a suspended execution: Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendant B of a community service order: Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendant A: The reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is that Defendant A did not focus on the degree of interference with business, while Defendant B did not focus on physical violence, the content of verbal abuse is very high.