Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
[Criminal Records] The Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two years on September 14, 2017 by the Seoul Western District Court for the crime of obstructing the performance of official duties, etc. The Defendant is still under suspended sentence, which became final and conclusive on September 22, 2017.
[2] On May 19, 2018, the Defendant: (a) 12:05, the Defendant saw the Defendant to be drunk at C’s front of C, and she dump at C, upon receipt of 112 reports; (b) she expressed the Defendant’s slope E with the Sam-gu Police Station D police box belonging to the Sam-gu Police Station where she was under the influence of alcohol, and F, without any reason, the Defendant her desire to “erobbbbing the fright, fright, etc. to have the Defendant invalid; and (c) she expressed the desire to “f, fumbing the fumme to have the Defendant returned to her home,” and she dumped the f’s chest at one time at one time, and fumbing the Defendant’s son’s son’s son’s son’s fum, and she spited the Defendant’s son’s fum to the son’s left.
Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers concerning the handling of 112 reports.
Summary of Evidence
1. Statement by the defendant in court;
1. Each police statement made to E and F;
1. Relevant photographs;
1. Previous convictions: Application of Acts and subordinate statutes, such as a reply to inquiry, such as criminal history, investigation report (the fact that the period of probation is in progress, and attachment of a summary order to police officers), and copy of judgment;
1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;
1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;
1. Determination of the sentence as ordered by taking into account the following circumstances: the Defendant’s age, sex, environment, health condition, motive, means and consequence of the commission of the crime, circumstances after the commission of the crime, and various conditions of sentencing as shown in the argument of the instant case:
A favorable circumstances: A justifiable public authority is to interfere with the execution of official duties, which is unfavorable to the point that one reflects his mistake.