logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 성남지원 2012.02.17 2011고단1575
영유아보육법위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

No person shall receive a subsidy by fraud or other improper means.

From December 6, 2008, the Defendant was operating a “D Child Care Center” as a nursery in Seongbuk-gu, Seongbuk-gu, Seongbuk-gu, Seongbuk-gu.

Child care facilities eligible for subsidies from the Seongbuk-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Office shall comply with the maximum number of infant care fees publicly announced by the Mayor/Do Governor in order to receive childcare services subsidies from the Seongbuk-gu Office, comply with the "total number of children" and "building-to-child ratio", implement accounting reports in accordance with the Financial Accounting Rules, and shall not meet all requirements for suspension of operation due to the violation of Acts and subordinate statutes and guidelines.

Although the Defendant obtained permission for the childcare quota of “D childcare center” as 39 persons, from May 3, 2010 to December 9, 2010, the Defendant denied subsidies of KRW 57,956,50,00, including basic childcare fees, from Jung-gu Office from around November 28, 2009 to around December 31, 2009, and from June 28, 2010 to July 31, 2010, the Defendant received subsidies of KRW 57,956,50,00, including basic childcare fees, from Jung-gu Office, by falsely reporting the excess childcare in a manner that does not register the excess childcare in the childcare integration system.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of the witness J;

1. A written accusation;

1. Basic infant care fees and the details of unjust receipt of subsidies for the D child care centers, current status of children by half of the D child care centers, and details of subsidies for infant care;

1. Application of statutes on copies of guidance for infant care services in 2011;

1. Relevant Article 54 (2) of the Infant Care Act and Article 54 (2) of the Infant Care Act concerning criminal facts;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;

arrow