logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안산지원 2020.06.17 2019고단4145
전기통신사업법위반
Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by a fine of 30,000,000 won, and the defendant corporation B shall be punished by a fine of 12,00,000 won, respectively.

Defendant

A.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A (criminal record) was sentenced by the Seoul Western District Court on February 6, 2013 to imprisonment for a violation of the Telecommunications Business Act, etc., and the execution of the sentence was completed on January 12, 2014 at the Seoul Western District Court.

【Criminal Facts】

The Defendant is a person who operates a separate telecommunications company with the trade name "(main)B" in Geumcheon-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government C Building D.

No person shall provide services that can display a false phone number of a caller for profit, such as forging a false phone number of a caller.

Nevertheless, around April 25, 2016, the Defendant established and operated the Defendant’s Dispute Resolution Co., Ltd., and received KRW 36,500, in return for the payment of KRW 1,00,00 per annum, from customers, to provide the Internet telephone opening and call number change service.

On November 8, 2016, the Defendant provided the “G” from the Yandong E Building F of the Magu, Ansan-si, the Defendant changed the phone number to I when the phone calls were sent. From that time until February 24, 2017, the Defendant provided the Defendant with the service of falsely displaying the phone number 2,380 times as indicated in the attached crime list, from that time, when the phone number was changed to I.

2. The Defendant (State) provided the Defendant, whose representative, with the service of the Defendant, with a false phone number of 2,380 times, as set out in paragraph (1).

Summary of Evidence

1. The application of Acts and subordinate statutes, such as Defendant A’s written statement of Defendant A, the military prosecutor’s report on the change of number B, the military prosecutor’s report on the change of number, the list of the changed subscriber’s representative number, the verification of the forgery of user certification, the data requested to send a copy of a specific communications business operator registration certificate related to forgery, the Internet telephone, and the application submitted

1. Article relevant to the facts constituting an offense and the selection of punishment;

A. Defendant A:

arrow