logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2018.05.23 2017고단6013
전기통신사업법위반
Text

Defendants shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

Defendant

If A does not pay the above fine, it shall be 100.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. No person who is a defendant shall provide services that can display a false phone number of a caller for profit, such as duplicating the phone number of a caller;

Nevertheless, on April 25, 2016, the Defendant concluded an agency business contract with C around April 25, 2016, to pay a certain percentage of the telecommunications rates of KRW 100,000 for the basic fee for the Internet telephone line with C, and if C receives an application form from the customer, an application form for change of the call indication, and a representative number certificate, and transferred it to B, the Defendant provided the service of change of the Internet telephone opening and the call number indication to the customer at the price of KRW 27 per minute per domestic mobile phone call.

Accordingly, on April 26, 2016, C submitted a written application for subscription to the Internet telephone, an application for change of the Internet phone number display, and an application for proof of the fact of subscription to the Internet, and transferred it to the staff in charge of B, who received the Defendant’s direction. The above staff in charge opened the Internet telephone from Guro-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government F and G Ho B through I or J, rather than the call call connected to the representative telephone H, and thereafter changed the call number of the above Internet telephone to H from December 30, 2016 to December 30, 2016.

As a result, the Defendant conspired with C to provide services to change telephone numbers for profit by making a false representation.

2. Defendant B, an employee of the Defendant, provided services using a false phone number of 3,417 times as set forth in the above paragraph (1) for the Defendant’s business.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. The legal statement of the witness C;

1. Prosecutions against K.

arrow