1. The defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for eight months;

2.Provided, That the above sentence shall be executed for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant called “2017 Highest 7975” as a social service personnel on August 25, 2016, and posted D elementary schools from September 2016 to Esung City, and served as a general administrative support personnel.

The Defendant did not work at D elementary schools, who are working places, on the ground that he/she ought to pay money for a total of eight days from June 7, 2017 to June 9, 2017, and June 12, 2017 to June 16, 2016.

Accordingly, the defendant, as a social service personnel, has deserted his service for at least eight days in total without justifiable grounds.

"2017 Highest 8222"

1. On April 8, 2017, the Defendant, who forged a private document and carried out a falsified investigation document, was kept in the “F point” located in the “F point” around 8, 2017, around 2017.

In the customer information column of the application form for KT Moble, personal information, such as the name, date of birth, cell phone number, address, etc., as “G” was written in the column of the applicant / subscriber (agent) and forged as “G”, and then issued the application form as if the document was duly concluded to H, an employee of the same location, who was aware of the forgery at that time.

For the purpose of uttering, the Defendant forged a letter of application for membership in G name, which is a private document on rights and obligations, and exercised it.

2. On April 18, 2017, the Defendant forged a private document and the instant investigation document: (a) on April 18, 2017, in the “Tord J position” located under the Tord J position in the Tord City I on April 18, 2017, had employees enter the personal information of G in the column of the customer who applied for subscription to a new service contract; (b) stated that “G” is “G” in the column of the customer who applied for subscription (agent) and signed the document next thereto.

As a result, the Defendant forged one copy of a new contract in the name of G, which is a private document related to rights and duties for the purpose of uttering, and around that time, delivered the forged application form to K, who is an employee of the same place, who is aware of the forgery, as if it was a document duly formed.

Summary of Evidence

"2017 Highest 7975"

1. The defendant's person;