logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 울산지방법원 2015.02.13 2014고정1962
공전자기록등불실기재등
Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by a fine for negligence of KRW 3,000,000, and by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

The Defendants respectively.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

D From 2005 to 2008, while engaging in the international marriage brokerage business called "F" in the racing, the defendant A, who is a Chinese citizen, was known to him.

G became aware of D with the introduction of H (G's guarantee of marriage) after D's high-speed, and it was intended to receive KRW 6 million from D in return for disguised marriage with B.

As a result, D tried to receive 2.8 million won (1.2 million won for money actually received) in return for Defendant B, who was in China, to enter into a disguised marriage with G and arrange a disguised marriage between G and B.

1. On August 22, 2008, the Defendants in collusion with G and D, and around 11:00, the facts in the Viewing and viewing family registry were to be entered into the false facts by allowing the public officials in charge of being aware of the fact to enter the false details of the marriage report into the family registry information system column, which is a public electronic record, as if they were married with G and Defendant B, despite the absence of the genuine intention of marriage between G and Defendant B.

Accordingly, in collusion with G and D, the Defendants made false reports to public officials and made false records to record false facts in public electronic records.

2. The Defendants conspired with G and D to use false information entered in the Supreme Court’s marriage certificate system as described in paragraph (1) to make it possible for national administrative agencies to make electronic inquiries and output.

As a result, the Defendants, in collusion with G and D, exercised official electronic records recording the false facts made as described in paragraph 1.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. A protocol concerning the examination of each police officer in relation to G or D;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to report internal investigation (ablock relation certificate, etc.);

1. Relevant Articles 228(1) and 30 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts and the choice of punishment.

arrow