logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 동부지원 2017.07.12 2017고정223
업무방해
Text

1. Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000;

2. If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[Basic Facts] The Defendant operates a reading room on the third floor of the same building as a person who owns a third floor building of the building in Nam-gu Busan Metropolitan City.

On February 2016, the Defendant: (a) leased the instant building to the victim E (hereinafter “F”); and (b) operated the frequency of the victim’s “F”; (c) the second floor includes the English Private Teaching Institutes and the third floor includes the reading room operated by the Defendant.

The Defendant paid KRW 760,00,00 for water supply costs from February 2016 to May 2016, 200 for the reading room operated by the Defendant on the ground that the number of water used by each store was high in the number of water used by the victim despite the installation of individual water meters for each store in the above building. The Defendant paid KRW 760,000 for water supply costs from February 2, 2016 to May 2016.

Although the Defendant was required to install separate water meters for each store from the victims with the above burden on water supply expenses, the Defendant rejected such request, and the Defendant did not accept the victim’s request to install separate water meters by paying the costs of installing the water gauges in the water supply business place.

Accordingly, on October 24, 2016, the injured party did not pay the water supply cost from May 2016 to August 2016 due to the indication of the claim against the Defendant, and on October 24, 2016, the water supply business operator taken a fractional measure against the above building on the ground that water supply is not delinquent at the water supply business place.

[2] On October 25, 2016, the Defendant: (a) on the building above around 08:00, the Defendant: (b) had G, a construction business operator, who built the building, cut off the water distribution line leading to the first floor and the first floor toilet in order to retaliation the victim on the ground that the victim did not pay water supply costs; and (c) had the Defendant paid water supply costs to the entire building; and (d) had G, a construction business operator, who built the building, cut off the water distribution line leading to the first floor and the first floor toilet; and (e) prevented the victim from running the business during the frequency operated by the victim from around that time to November 2, 2016.

Accordingly, the defendant is forced to engage in the frequency business operated by the injured party by force.

arrow