logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안양지원 2018.03.23 2017고합222
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(뇌물)등
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment of 5 years and fine of 70,000,000 won, Defendant B of 3 years and 45,000,000 won, respectively.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[Basic Facts] From October 2010 to January 2017, Defendant A has been in charge of duties, such as water supply and drainage management at H’s water supply and drainage team.

Defendant

B is a chief of the water supply and sewerage business and the charge management guidance in I, from 2006, he has been in charge of the management of the water supply and sewerage and the charge management system in I, from the point of time to the point of time.

J operates L Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “L”), and N Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “N”) in the same Gu M, and is engaged in manufacturing and selling water-based water meter measuring instruments auxiliary inspection devices (hereinafter referred to as “video inspection devices”).

O is a person who operates Q Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “ Q”) in the Military P in the Military P, and is engaged in the manufacture and sale of an electronic inspection machine for water supply.

[Criminal facts]

1. Defendant A

A. A. The water supply and sewerage business place at H in violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Bribery) was intended to install a video sprink developed by L around 2011 at H time.

From October 2010 to H’s water rate team for water supply and drainage facilities, the Defendant purchased necessary images from L to H while working in H’s water rate team for water supply and drainage facilities, and entered into a relationship with J, the representative director of L.

On October 25, 2012, the Defendant received KRW 6,00,000 from the J to the new bank account (S) in the name of the Defendant’s birth, from around December 2016, and received KRW 64,00,000,00 from around seven times in total under the above name, as shown in attached Table 1, from around December 2016, in consideration of convenience for the supply of L’s video inspection devices to H at H.

B. In the event of acceptance of bribe H, the water supply and sewerage business place decided to install water supply electronic postmortem measuring instruments developed by Q around September 2012 at the H time.

The defendant as above.

arrow