logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 고양지원 2019.06.27 2018고단3253
성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매)등
Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for ten months and by imprisonment with prison labor for six months.

except that from the date of this judgment.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

B is a person who operates a commercial sex acts business establishment in Goyang-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Office Officetel D, and the defendant A is a man who purchases sexual sex.

1. Defendant A

A. On August 21, 2018, the Defendant violated the Act on the Punishment of Arrangement of Commercial Sex Acts, Etc. (sexual traffic) giving KRW 200,000 in cash to E (the transfer of the same day sexual traffic protection case) at the above officetels and provided the E and once sexual intercourse.

In addition, the Defendant engaged in sexual traffic more than four times from the beginning of August 2017 to the above time, such as the list of crimes in the list of crimes.

B. The defendant is in violation of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes (Ameras, etc.).

At the time and place mentioned in the port, in which E entered a toilet, a cell phone auxiliary gate form owned by the Defendant, put a sofet over the direction of the befet, and then subdivided a photographer into a shooting range, and taken the face of the sex relationship between the Defendant and E.

From early August 2017, the Defendant taken four times in total, the body of a person, who may cause sexual humiliation or shame, using a camera or other similar device with similar function, such as a list of crimes, against the will of the person subject to filming.

2. Defendant B

A. The Defendant violated the Act on the Punishment of Arrangement of Commercial Sex Acts, Etc. (the Act on the Punishment of Commercial Sex Acts, Etc.) posted sexual traffic advertisements to “F” on the Internet site at the same time and place as stated in paragraph (1) of Article 1, and had the contacted A talk with “E” and “F”, thereby arranging sexual traffic.

B. On July 2018, the Defendant, in violation of the Act on the Punishment of Arrangement of Commercial Sex Acts, Etc. (the Act on the Punishment of Arrangement of Commercial Sex Acts, Etc.), posted a letter on the Internet site’s “G” to seek sexual traffic, thereby employing E, who has contacted, as an employee of sexual traffic, recruited a person to engage in sexual traffic.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ each.

arrow