1. The Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant) paid KRW 6,070,677 to the Defendant (Counterclaim Plaintiff) and its related amount from May 6, 2013 to August 10, 2016.

A principal lawsuit and a counterclaim shall be deemed simultaneously.

1. Establishment of liability for damages;

A. Basic facts 1) On May 6, 2013, the Plaintiff: (a) on May 6, 2013, 2013, the Plaintiff: (b) was aware of the upper tier of the upper tier in the air railway inside the Incheon Airport of the Digital Media City located in Mapo-gu, Seoul; (c) caused the Defendant’s head (hereinafter “instant accident”); (d) caused the lower tier of the lower tier; and (e) caused the Defendant’s head.

2) The Defendant: (a) on May 6, 2013; (b) on May 6, 2013,

5.7. Dental Medical Center and Dradioactivelogical Center:

5.9. Gacheon-ro Hospital:

6.4. Hybin Hospital;

6.5. Ethicals;

6. 14. Tol University, medical treatment was provided in sequence to the Tolian Hospital;

【Ground of recognition】 The fact that there has been no dispute, Gap 1’s entry, and the purport of whole pleadings

B. According to the facts of recognition as above, the plaintiff is liable for damages suffered by the defendant due to the accident in this case.

2. Scope of liability for damages

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion 1) The Defendant alleged that the instant accident occurred merely due to the injury inflicted on the conical salt base. As such, medical expenses not exceeding four weeks from the date of the instant medical treatment period are positive damage in proximate causal relation with the instant accident, and only passive damage arising from the loss of labor capacity for a limited period of one year (14%) from the date of the award due to the climatic salt base and mental damage premised on the climatic salt base (14%) can be acknowledged. The Defendant asserted that the instant accident occurred in addition to the climatic salt base, in addition to the climatic salt base, due to the instant accident, all medical expenses incurred up to the date of the instant accident were positive damage in proximate causal relation with the instant accident. The Defendant’s assertion that all medical expenses incurred up to the date of the instant accident were positive damage in proximate causal relation with the instant accident.