Text
1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Reasons
1. Details of the disposition;
A. On July 30, 1993, the Plaintiff suffered from the injury of “multi-closion base and hydro-closion with nuclear escape symptoms” due to a traffic accident during official duties (hereinafter “the primary accident”) and received medical care for public duties from July 30, 1993 to July 29, 1995 as a traffic accident during work at the National Police Agency, Gyeonggi-do Regional Police Agency, Incheon District Police Agency, and Police Station Information and Security Service, and from November 8, 2011 (hereinafter “the second accident”), and received from the injury of “closion, closion, and tension” (hereinafter “the second accident”) during the first accident and the second accident from November 8, 201 to January 6, 2012.
B. On November 7, 2016, the Plaintiff approved the Defendant as an additional injury and disease, and applied for an extension of the medical care period from November 2, 2016 to January 11, 2017, the Plaintiff filed an application for the extension of the period from November 2, 2016 to November 11, 2017.
C. On November 22, 2016, the Defendant: (a) stated to the Plaintiff on November 22, 2016, that “the injury or disease approved by the second accident is the luxal base, tension, and tension of the luxal base, and medically, in the case of the luxal base, it is difficult for the Plaintiff to suffer from the luxal and luxal base by the disease being treated when the prime period from the outbreak date of the disease occurs; (b) the luxal base of the luxal base, by the luxal base, by the luxal base, and the luxal base of the luxal base; and (c) according to the submitted RoI CD reading, the disease or disease approved by the first accident is the luxal base and the luxal base of the luxal base and the luxal base of the 18 years after the injury, and there seems to exist no medical causal relationship between the 1,22016 additional medical advice.