1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the plaintiff corresponding to the money ordered to be paid in addition to the following shall be revoked.

1. The reasoning of the court's explanation concerning this case is as follows, and this part of the judgment of the court of first instance is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except where part of the judgment of the court of first instance is used as follows. Thus, this is accepted in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420

2. The “statement of calculation of damages” in part of the first instance judgment shall be replaced by the annexed sheet in the attached Form 6.

The 17th to 6th of the third decision of the first instance shall be made in accordance with the following subparagraphs.

“) According to the result of the first instance court’s commission of physical examination on the head of GH hospital and the fact-finding on the head of GH hospital in the first instance court’s medical corporation, the Plaintiff suffered injury with a half of the floor size above the upper floor due to the instant accident, and the above disability is permanent, appraisal J in the first instance court’s opinion to the effect that the Plaintiff lost 5% labor ability by deeming the Plaintiff to fall under “the remaining in the face of the bridge exposure” under class 4 of class 14 of the Enforcement Decree of the State Compensation Act (No. 2 of the Enforcement Decree of the State Compensation Act), and that it is difficult to apply the above injury in the future to calculate the medical expenses necessary for the Plaintiff due to the instant accident. However, it is recognized that not only the Plaintiff’s physical disability but also the Plaintiff’s average rate of labor disability is higher than the Plaintiff’s average rate of labor disability in the second instance.