1. The Defendant’s disposition of non-approval of an additional injury or disease against the Plaintiff on November 8, 2017 is revoked.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On December 16, 2013, the Plaintiff was an employee of Pyeongtaek-si Factory Co., Ltd., who was working in the company’s commuting bus, and was trying to avoid a sealed bus that entered the front intersection of “D Real Estate” located in Pyeongtaek-si and entered the road, and was faced with an accident that shocks the signal apparatus pole on the right side of the road (hereinafter “instant accident”).

B. On December 14, 2016, the Plaintiff received the diagnosis of “Weekern base, fluoral salt base, both sloral salt base, sloral slorum base, external stress disorder, cerebral lurraxia” due to the instant accident, and applied for the first medical care benefit to the Defendant on the instant date.

C. On February 7, 2017, the Defendant notified the Plaintiff of the result of the first medical care benefit application as follows.

On May 8, 2017, the Plaintiff filed a request for review against the Plaintiff, but was dismissed on July 3, 2017.

In case of an applicant-related disease: - Partial approval of the decision of the court pursuant to Article 37 of the Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance Act and Article 27 of the Enforcement Decree of the same Act: - In case of an applicant-related disease, he shall be influoral base, luoral base, both luoral base, luoral base, both luoral base, eluoral base, eluoral stress disorder - Unauthorizedly approved disease: Brain, nephraxia - The reason for the approval of brain, nephoral damage, nephraxia - The fact that the opinion in the food room or neological deficit was not confirmed at the time of the instant accident. - The negoraxia is not a serious disease due to a prosecutor's proof.

On June 12, 2017, the Plaintiff received a diagnosis of “the instant additional injury to external brain (hereinafter “the instant additional injury”)” and filed an application for additional injury to the instant additional injury on August 2, 2017 with the Defendant on the following occasions: (a) the brain proliferation content inspection, the brain emitting dysical dysical dysical dysical dysical dysical dysical dysical dysical dysical dysical dysical dysical

However, the defendant has submitted the "Cinematographic Data".