Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.
The facts charged against the defendant in the case 2013 Highest 408 shall be acquitted.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
[2012 Highest 1593] On July 14, 2012, the Defendant interfered with the construction work of N, O, Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “N,”) which is the contractor of the instant construction project by force in collusion with E, etc., and interfered with the construction work of N, O, Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “N,”) by force over seven occasions, as indicated in the attached list of crimes, by force.
[2013 Highest 770]
1. The crime committed on August 15, 2012;
A. On August 15, 2012, at around 16:04 to 17:26, the Defendant interfered with the business of the Defendant, along with E, P, Q, K, L, etc., opened a fluorite on the road in front of the project site of the instant construction project site, and obstructed the construction vehicles for the construction of concrete building of R, such as R, by holding them a fluort at the construction site, thereby hindering the construction site from entering the construction site. In collusion with E, the Defendant interfered with the construction works of the instant construction project, N,O, and partner company, and interfered with the construction works of the Dispute Resolution, the Dispute Resolution and the Dispute Resolution and the Dispute Resolution Co.
B. The obstruction of performance of official duties and the Defendant’s injury on August 15, 2012: (a) around 17:25, 201
At the port location, the police officers of the Seoul Metropolitan Police Agency (V, 28 years old) tried to move the defendant, who was connected to the road, to the side by moving the defendant to the side, and the defendant started to walk the right sway of the victim who was flicking, and thereby, the defendant was flicking to the right side of the victim, which requires treatment of about 12 weeks (including additional diagnosis). At the same time, the victim's crime prevention, suppression, and maintenance of order could interfere with legitimate execution of duties.
2. The crime committed on October 5, 2012;
A. On October 5, 2012, the Defendant interfered with the instant construction project along with W, I, L, etc. around 17:03 to 17:16.