Defendant shall be punished by a fine of one million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

On November 2014, the Defendant and B received the victim E, who is the representative director of the D Co., Ltd. for the business of manufacturing automation facilities in Syang-si around 2014, and then received the issuance of a certified copy, etc. of the corporate seal certificate and a certified copy, etc. from the injured party after the introduction of the victim E, which is the representative director of the D Co., Ltd. for the business of manufacturing automation facilities in Syang-si.

A. On November 12, 2014, inasmuch as there was no fact that the Defendant and B were entrusted with the affairs relating to the fabrication of a private document, the event of the said investigation document, and (1) around November 12, 2014, the Defendant and B forged two copies of the mobile phone service contract under the victim’s name, which is the private document related to rights and obligations, by entering the name of the victim in the case of the customer’s application for purchase of a new contract for the mobile phone service (application for purchase) and the agent column, for the purpose of exercising the said D’s rights and obligations, although there was no fact that the victim was entrusted with the affairs relating to the opening of the mobile phone in the name of the said D corporation, the Defendant and B forged two copies of the mobile phone service contract under the victim’s name, which is the private document related to the rights and obligations.

(2) The Defendant and B exercised the following: (a) at the time and place described in the foregoing paragraph, and (b) at the time and at the same time, two of the forged mobile phone service new contracts were delivered to I, an employee of the mobile phone sales store, as described in paragraph (1).

(3) The Defendant and B entered the victim’s mobile phone at the time and place described in the above paragraphs (1) and (2) and did not have the intent or ability to pay the price and fees for the mobile phone since the fact was the victim’s mobile phone opening, and delivered two copies of the aforementioned new mobile service contract to I as if the victim obtained the victim’s consent. The Defendant and B obtained two copies of the aforementioned new mobile service contract from I immediately and obtained two copies of the mobile phone call (the telephone number: J and K) from I.

B. On November 14, 2014, the forgery of a private document, the uttering of a falsified document, and the Defendant and B, around November 14, 2014, are not more than Busan around November 14, 2014.