logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2014.10.01 2013고단7885
사기등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than two years and six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person who is in office in the E Co., Ltd. operated by the victim D in Yeonsu-gu Incheon Metropolitan City from April 1, 1995 to March 31, 2013 and is engaged in the business of supplying food materials.

Although the Defendant purchased food materials and supplied them to customers such as F, the Defendant had forged a supply transaction list by forging the supply transaction list of the victim company, and received the purchase transaction amount from the victim and received from the victim to use them for daily living expenses.

1. Crimes such as forging a detailed list of transactions;

A. On December 8, 2010, the Defendant: (a) stated “F Return”; (b) “E” and “543,000 won” in the column of supply value in the business partner column of the transaction specification sheet of the said E Co., Ltd. at the office of the said E Co., Ltd.; and (c) affixed the seal in advance on his name and affixed the seal in the column of name “E” and “E”; and (d) supplied the E Co., Ltd. with food of an amount equivalent to KRW 543,00 won from the E Co., Ltd., to F; (b) forged one sheet of transaction in the name of E Co., Ltd.; and (c) submitted it to the victim from that time until February 28, 2013.

Accordingly, for the purpose of exercising a certificate of fact, the Defendant forged and used 808 copies of the transaction list in the name of E Co., Ltd. G, which is a private document of fact-finding.

B. On December 8, 2010, the Defendant, at the above office, presented to the victim a false statement of purchase of goods in accordance with the said statement of trading and the statement of supply value, and falsely stated that “The Defendant purchased food materials equivalent to KRW 323,000, as it purchased food materials to deliver to F, which is the customer of the today, the Defendant would be required to pay the purchase price.”

However, the defendant did not purchase food materials equivalent to the above money.

arrow