logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 정읍지원 2013.04.18 2013고단69
폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(집단ㆍ흉기등재물손괴등)등
Text

Defendant

A and D Imprisonment for 10 months, Defendant B, C and F shall be punished by imprisonment for 8 months, and Defendant E shall be punished by imprisonment for 6 months.

(b).

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A The head of H organization JJ branch, Defendant B, Defendant C, the head of Trade Union Division of the same Trade Union, Defendant D, Defendant D’s head of Trade Union M branch of the same Trade Union, Defendant F’s head of N branch of H organization N branch of H organization, Defendant F’s head of N branch N branch of H organization N branch of H organization, the Defendants, on September 19, 2012, consulted on the compensation issue for the accidents that died while driving a dump truck at the Q branch of Jung-Eup in order to avoid smooth progress.

1. The Defendants A, B, C, D, and F’s co-offenders committed by themselves around 15:00 on September 21, 2012, in front of the opening of the opening of the opening of the opening of the opening of the opening of the Eup, Defendant A, B, C, D, and F entered the opening of the opening of the opening of the opening of the opening of the Eup, and Defendant E enters the opening of the opening of the opening of the opening of the opening of the opening of the opening of the Eup, and Defendant E, as a matter of compensation, entered the opening of the opening of the opening of the opening of the opening of the Eup, and Defendant A, B, C, D, and F had 20 persons, including the Defendants, prior to the opening of the opening of the opening of the opening of the Eup. As such, Defendant A, C, D, and F sent the public power to prevent the Defendants from entering the opening of the opening of the Eup market.

2. The Defendants’ co-offendered Defendants destroyed the door of the market room at the time, time, and place set forth in the preceding paragraph and intruded into the market room by showing multiple power.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each protocol of prosecutorial statement concerning R, S and T;

1. Application of each police statement statute to U and V;

1. Article applicable to criminal facts;

A. Defendant A, B, C, D, and F: Articles 3(1) and 2(1)1 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act, Article 366 of the Criminal Act (a point of causing damage to a group, deadly weapon, etc.), Articles 3(1), 2(1)1, and 319(1) of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (a point of causing harm to a group, deadly weapon, etc.).

arrow