Defendant

A A A Fines of 8 million won, Defendant B, D, and G each fine of 4 million won, and Defendant C of a fine of 3 million won, Defendant E.

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendants A, B, D, E, F, G, and C have an objection to the occurrence of a collective assault by the labor union (hereinafter referred to as the “labor union No. 2”) labor union members in the Asia-siJ (hereinafter referred to as the “labor union No. 2”) from the labor union members in the Nowon-gu in the Nowon-gu in Seoul-si. Defendant A had an electric shock machine, which is a dangerous object, and made the rest of the Defendants and 10 union members in the second union office in order to find out the 1 union members, while making the rest of the Defendants and 10 union members in the name of the 2 union.

Defendants seem to have written errors in the indictment Chapter 15:30 on June 16, 2014.

In the light of the foregoing K Note 2 division, the victim M of the 1 Nowon-gu in the light of the Note 1 to the Defendants

빨리 꺼져 ”라고 욕설을 한다는 이유로, 피고인 A은 어깨로 피해자의 어깨를 밀치고, 피해자가 이에 항의하자 피고인 B, A은 발로 피해자의 정강이를 각 1회 걷어찼다.

In response, when the injured party gets up to Defendant B, Defendant D inserted Defendant A’s indictment on the charge of inserting the victim’s neck by hand, pushing the victim’s 3m volume by hand, booming the victim’s neck by hand from June 16, 2016 to June 16:30 of the same day, and the Defendants corrected ex officio the indictment by inserting Defendant A’s indictment between Defendant A and “the left side buckbbbbbs” as the column for the charge of the attached crime No. 1, 3, and 4 of the daily list of crimes in the attached Table No. 1, 3, and 4 from June 16, 2016 to 16:30 of the same day.

5 As described in paragraph 5, the victims were assaulted by four times in total by force of more than 1 Trade Union 40 members and by multiple force.

2. On June 16, 2014, Defendants C, E, and B entered into the above K’s environment with more than 40 lighting staff members of 1 Nowon-gu and 40 as well as their name in the office. Defendant E had two chemical parts on E-rayed with the victim N, and Defendant B had two chemical parts on E-rayed with the victim’s birth, and Defendant B had the victim’s name unexplodedd by taking several steps, and the victims were victims by force.