logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 2014. 03. 27. 선고 2013두26880 판결
(심리불속행) 명의수탁자임을 인정할 증거가 없으므로 양도소득세 과세는 적법함[국승]
Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit

Seoul High Court 2012Nu29327 ( November 15, 2013)

Title

(C) If there is no evidence to prove that the trustee is a trustee, taxation of capital gains tax is legitimate.

Summary

(In the first instance, the buyer is the actual owner of the real estate and the principal is the title trustee on the completion of the ownership transfer registration due to the sale and purchase of the summary. However, since the reason for title trust is not clear and there is lack of objective evidence to conceal the title trust relationship, the disposition imposing capital gains tax is legitimate.

Cases

2013Du26880 Revocation of Disposition of Imposing capital gains tax

Plaintiff-Appellant

AA

Defendant-Appellee

b Head of the Tax Office

Judgment of the lower court

Seoul High Court Decision 2012Nu29327 Decided November 15, 2013

Text

The appeal is dismissed.

The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiff.

Reasons

All of the records of this case and the judgment of the court below and the grounds of appeal were examined, but the grounds of appeal by the appellant are not included in the grounds provided by each subparagraph of Article 4(1) of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Procedure for Appeal. Thus, the appeal is dismissed pursuant to Article 5 of the same Act. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent

arrow